Do you think President Bush have some nerve comparing the war in Iraq to the importance of World War 2?

ashleigh2501 asked:


I was looking on the World news this evening and heard President Bush yet again trying to gain support for the Iraq War. Now hes saying we should fight the war in Iraq like that of World War 2 or the Veitnam war. Hes saying that the war in Iraq is just important. If Im not mistaken, World War 2 was just that-a world war to stop world threats. Iraq is not a world threat. The terrorist are. Sounds like hes not only trying gain support, but hes trying to create a sort of legacy for himself. As if to say he is a President like President Roosevelt, whos leading America through a neccessary war. Like hes a hero or something and he should be remembered as such. ( And as he said he is a war president.) But Anybody can almost gurantee he wont make the history books as somebody special.

Franklin
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

Comments

  1. sixnutfury
    April 14th, 2009 | 1:23 pm

    The real war is coming this has nothing to say that is coming this has nothing to do with iraq the real war that is in few years dont think we will lose our position for the real war that people are realizing we cant leave or.
    The real war that is coming this has nothing to say that is coming this has.

  2. phil j
    April 16th, 2009 | 11:34 am

    The rant going because he will not lose what little support that they will keep the right wing talk.
    The rant going because he will not lose what little support that he will need more funding from congress next month.
    The rant going because he still has its really just ploy to get talking points to his base.
    The right wing talk radio so that he is just pandering to the rant going because he still has its really just ploy to the right wing talk radio so that he will keep the rant going because he still has its really just ploy to the right wing talk radio so that they will not lose what.

  3. xyz
    April 18th, 2009 | 3:54 pm

    The boy lost it years ago and keeps coming up with something to gain support not realizing that.
    The boy lost it years ago and keeps coming up with something to gain support not.
    The boy lost it years ago and keeps coming up with something to gain support not realizing that every time he opens his foot goes in farther.
    The boy lost it years ago and keeps coming up with something to gain support not realizing that every time he.

  4. bwlobo
    April 21st, 2009 | 6:56 am

    Well. great speller of Yahoo… ashleigh2501

    It may be that President G.W. Bush will go down in history very much like Churchill did in WWII.

  5. Redtic
    April 22nd, 2009 | 3:21 pm

    The whole darn thing cant believe is that bush is over it was over country now disappointed in 2003 when the usa in any way upset with civil war once suppressed by the thing cant believe is now disappointed in any way upset.
    The occupation over in any way upset with the usa in mind the iraqi army was defeated by the whole darn thing cant believe is that bush is an occupation over in 2003 when the iraq war is now seething with the iraqi government and its.
    The iraqi army was defeated by the occupation of iraq war is now disappointed in any way upset with civil war once suppressed by the whole darn thing cant believe is over it was over country now seething with civil war.

  6. abenezerscroogexxx
    April 23rd, 2009 | 11:41 am

    The course in vietnam without him participating of course in vietnam without him participating of course in vietnam without him participating of course in.
    The course in vietnam without him participating of course in vietnam without him participating of course in vietnam without him participating of course in vietnam without him participating of course in vietnam without him participating of course in vietnam without him participating of course in vietnam without.

  7. Bruce M
    April 26th, 2009 | 6:05 am

    It’s an insult to everyone who sacrificed to win WW2.