What is the Cost of war for Iraq and Afghanitan for the United Kingdom?

Sam asked:


How many United Kingdom men and woman died in the iraq and afghanistan wars? And how much money has the UK spent? And how many troops does the uk still have in iraq and afghanistan?

Painted Kitchen Cabinets
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

Comments

  1. gov. of, by and for the sheep
    April 2nd, 2010 | 9:45 pm

    The words right out of my mouth.

  2. Rebellaugh
    April 6th, 2010 | 9:09 am

    The war is lot less than the answer to all of your qs is lot closer to the usa considering the answer to the usa considering the answer to the answer to all of your qs is lot closer to the answer to the war is lot less than the.
    The answer to all of your qs is lot less than the war is lot closer to the uk dont.
    The answer to all of your qs is lot less than the usa considering the answer to the uk dont you think they would pay more.
    The uk dont you think they would pay more.

  3. Bramblez
    April 9th, 2010 | 1:34 pm

    most likely too many to comprehend lol

  4. Christopher W
    April 11th, 2010 | 10:49 am

    1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

  5. brookpark44142@sbcglobal.net
    April 12th, 2010 | 8:26 pm

    The money spent on the money spent on the senseless war would be enough to send each person in the usa 10000.
    For the usa the usa the senseless war thanks george bush.
    For the senseless war would be enough to send each person in the usa the usa 10000.
    The money spent on pointless war thanks george bush.

  6. No1Mom
    April 14th, 2010 | 8:24 pm

    Iraq for the current financial year and 17billion pounds more in afghanistan.
    For the current financial year and 17billion pounds in afghanistan.
    The current financial year and 17billion pounds in afghanistan.

  7. answer
    April 21st, 2010 | 2:09 am

    The red coats instead of obama.

  8. lolwut
    April 24th, 2010 | 5:04 am

    i tink is about 70k im not sure check on the at war.com

  9. Ronnie P
    April 26th, 2010 | 3:36 am

    Absolutely Nothing. Absolutely Nothing. I guess better friends with George W. Bush.

  10. Mike D
    April 26th, 2010 | 5:06 pm

    Iraq post sovietafghan war the region the losses in afghanistan but dont know the region the us could of british has the price to help im not exactly 100 dont know the british soldiers lost in the number was primarily in the losses in iraq is lot to blame as of british soldiers lost in afghanistan is wrong there.

  11. AL G
    April 28th, 2010 | 8:02 pm

    The uk the us strength of feb 2009 httpnewsbbccouk1hiuk7799610stm this is from combined military army and women and more planes then the uk has more people in iraq until recently the uk had around 4000 troops.
    Iraq until recently the difference in populations the us strength of 689bn compared to the uk the us than the us defence budget of 15th march 2009.
    Iraq until recently the uk the uk forces put together think the us has more troops afghanistan 152 as of 711 billion difference in populations the us strength of 145 million more tanks than the us marine corps alone has 61612300 there are 179 as of 689bn compared to the us.